SkillSet SAReporting · Analytics · InsightRequested but not planned
Training needs may exist in the workbook without a corresponding WSP intervention or booking decision.
Product demonstration case study · WSP / ATR
From training spreadsheets to WSP / ATR reporting readiness.
The SkillSet WSP / ATR Demo shows how a workbook-first process can expose planning, evidence and reconciliation gaps before information is trusted for management reporting.
The reporting challenge
Demand, planning and achievement often live in different spreadsheet moments.
WSP and ATR reporting becomes difficult when requested training, planned interventions, completed activity and supporting evidence cannot be reconciled through one controlled workflow.
Planned but not achieved
Planned activity needs operational follow-through, status ownership and an explanation when delivery changes.
Achieved but not supported
Completion records need confirmed evidence and a clean relationship back to the approved reporting chain.
Workbook-first workflow
Load, inspect, manage and report.
The demonstration is organised around the practical journey a reporting team would need to control.
Workbook intake
Load demand, WSP planning and ATR achievement records into a single review surface.
Diagnostic checks
Separate stable records from planning, evidence, ownership and data-quality risks.
Training operations
Book training, capture status changes and record completed activity.
Review and sign-off
Assign findings, record decisions and maintain a visible submission-readiness trail.
Reporting views
Compare requested, planned and achieved records with management-ready summaries.
Data Quality Centre
Six practical checks before the figures are trusted.
The live demo tests the active dataset for common risks that weaken planning, evidence and reconciliation.
Employee profile gaps
Find missing or unconfirmed fields in employee reporting profiles.
Duplicate employee numbers
Detect duplicate identifiers that could distort counts or employee history.
Incomplete interventions
Flag records missing an employee, course, provider or reporting period.
Invalid costs
Identify planned or actual cost values that need correction or confirmation.
Evidence gaps
Highlight achieved activity without confirmed supporting evidence.
Requested to planned to achieved
Expose records that fall outside the expected WSP / ATR reporting chain.
What the public demo contains
A transparent synthetic dataset.
- 34 requested or suggested training records
- 28 planned WSP intervention records
- 21 achieved ATR records
- A current reconciliation view showing 19 items for review
- Demo bookings, provider filters and management summaries
- Budget figures labelled as planning estimates only
What the demonstration proves
A controlled workflow can be evaluated before production investment.
The workbook remains the starting point
The interface is designed around loading existing training information, because that is where many WSP / ATR reporting journeys begin.
Exceptions are more useful than blanket manual checking
The Data Quality Centre brings specific missing fields, duplicates, invalid costs, evidence gaps and reconciliation issues into a prioritised review list.
Static proof is not the same as a live Microsoft 365 solution
The demo supports product discussion and workflow validation. Production capability would only be claimed after the SharePoint, Dataverse, Power BI, permissions and governance components were configured and tested.
Bring the workbook and reporting workflow.
We’ll help identify the gaps, controls and reporting views a practical pilot should address.